Dalai Lamas Ethics and the New Genetics Free Essay Example, 1750 words

The justification of food cloning to feed the hungry is already being done by big companies such as Monsanto through GMO or Genetically Modified Organism except that it is not being use to feed the world but rather to make profit which has unhealthy consequences such as rising case of obesity, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. Also, GMO food or cloned food is not yet acceptable to everybody because its benefit, safety, and mode of production are still being debated. I however agree with his stance on the limits of human cloning. For the Dalai Lama, deliberately breeding semi-human beings for spare parts is revulsive. This may sound popular but the Dalai Lama is on a right track here. After all, he always advocated for a compassionate motivation and breeding human life to harvest spare parts does not have any iota of compassion. This however attests that the Dalai Lama is keeping track on technological advances and understood the ethical implication of it. This is evident with his perspective on parents who want to have a child through cloning and individuals who may clone themselves in the belief that will continue to live in the new cloned being (193). We will write a custom essay sample on Dalai Lama's Ethics and the New Genetics or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Dalai Lama answered the hypothesis from a Buddhist perspective that this is not possible. It may be an identical body but there will be two different bodies and they will still die. The answer was feasible from philosophical perspective but this has not been validated from scientific perspective so it should not be taken as a factual truth. In many ways I agree with the Dalai Lama because it shows that he recognizes the advances in technology and that there is a need to provide an ethical and moral guideline for its use. But just as the technology is complex, questions of ethics and morality often multiply with the advancement of technology. This needs to be assessed and evaluated to determine if morality and ethics can keep pace with the rapid advances in bioengineering and if indeed it is still possible to establish morality and ethics in technological advances Morals might be synonymous with ethics but it differs in a fundamental way. Morals co me from conscience and it is a standard of right and wrong that does not change with rules, time or norms. To be a moral person means doing the â€Å"right† thing regardless of law, rules or context. Ethics on the other hand is doing the â€Å"appropriate† thing which differs from morals because it only requires following a certain standard of right which is dictated by rules, norms and context whereas morals is not subjective.